Entrepreneurship Advice: Effective Mechanism or Theater? Administration of the Municipal Formation Tikhoretsk District Meetings of the Business Council
RESOLUTION
HEADS OF MUNICIPAL EDUCATION LENINGRAD DISTRICT
dated 16.01.2009, No. 28village Leningradskaya
About the Council on entrepreneurship of the municipality
Leningradsky district
In order to implement the state policy in the field of support and development of small business in the municipality of the Leningradsky District, in accordance with the Federal Law of July 24, 2007 No. 209-FZ "On the Development of Small and Medium Business in the Russian Federation", the Law of the Krasnodar Territory of April 04 2008 No. 1448-KZ "On the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Krasnodar Territory", in accordance with Article 23 of the Charter of the municipal formation, stating:1. To approve the composition of the Entrepreneurship Council of the municipal formation Leningradsky District (Appendix No. 1).
2. To approve the Regulation on the Council for Entrepreneurship of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District (Appendix No. 2).
3. The decree of the head of the Leningradsky district of February 7, 2003 No. 89 "On the Council for Entrepreneurship in the Leningradsky District" shall be considered invalid.
4. Control over the implementation of this resolution shall be entrusted to the first deputy head of the municipal formation V.G. Prokopets.
5. This resolution comes into force from the date of its signing and is subject to publication in the newspaper "Steppe Zori" and posting on the official website of the administration of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District on the Internet.
Head of the Municipal Formation
Leningradsky district S.V. Garkusha
ATTACHMENT
to the resolution of the administration
municipal formation
Leningradsky district
dated 07.06.2019 No. 452
"APPENDIX No. 1
APPROVED
by decree of
municipal formation
Leningradsky district
dated 16.01.2009, No. 28
COMPOSITION
Council for entrepreneurship of the municipality
Leningradsky district
|
Gordienko Fedor Nikolaevich |
Acting head of the municipality, chairman of the Council; |
|
Sheredekin Alexander Nikolaevich |
Deputy Head of the Municipal Formation, Deputy Chairman of the Council; |
|
Mishnyakov Vladimir Ivanovich |
Acting Deputy Head of the Municipal Formation, Head of the Department of Agriculture and Food Administration; |
|
Troyanovskaya Tatiana Vasilievna |
Head of Economic Development Department, |
|
Alexander Anatolyevich |
Head of the Department of Architecture and Urban Planning of the Administration of the Municipal Formation; |
|
Sherstobitov Vitaly Nikolaevich |
Head of the Department of Consumer Market and Services of the Administration of the Municipal Formation; |
|
Rita Grigorievna |
Head of the Property Relations Department of the Administration of the Municipal Formation; |
|
Aleksey Aleksandrovich |
Director of LLC Lenkompleksinvest (as agreed); |
|
Vladimir Alexandrovich |
Head of KFH "Teply Stan" (as agreed); |
|
Patrakov Vladimir Vladimirovich |
Director of LLC "Zavety Ilyich" (as agreed); |
|
Eremenko Nikita Alexandrovich |
Director of Ermak LLC (as agreed); |
|
Pavlogradsky Igor Vasilievich |
|
|
Karpenkov Eduard Vasilievich |
Individual entrepreneur, head of farm (as agreed); |
|
Sergey Nikolaevich |
Individual entrepreneur, (as agreed); |
|
Sexton Olga Alexandrovna |
Individual entrepreneur (as agreed). |
|
Salangin Artem Olegovich |
Individual entrepreneur (as agreed); |
|
Ponomarev Igor Nikolaevich |
General Director of LLC Leningradskiy Karavai (as agreed); |
|
Alexander Alexandrovich |
Founder LLC Firm "Juncker" (as agreed); |
|
Drobakhin Sergey Valerievich |
Director of LLC "Energocenter" (as agreed). |
Acting
head of the municipality
Leningradsky district F.N. Gordienko
APPENDIX No. 2
APPROVED BY
by decree of
municipal formation
Leningradsky district
dated 16.01.2009, No. 28
POSITION
about the Council on entrepreneurship of the municipality
Leningradsky district
1. General Provisions
1.1. This Regulation was developed in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated July 24, 2007 No. 209-FZ "On the development of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Russian Federation", the Law of the Krasnodar Territory dated April 04, 2008 No. 1448-KZ "On the development of small and medium-sized enterprises. entrepreneurship in the Krasnodar Territory ", regulatory acts of the Council of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky district and the head of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky district.
1.2. The Entrepreneurship Council of the Municipal Formation Leningradsky District (hereinafter referred to as the Council) is a permanent advisory body formed to ensure practical interaction of local governments and the population of the Leningradsky District municipality engaged in entrepreneurial activity, to consolidate their interests to develop proposals on the main areas of entrepreneurship development in the territory municipal formation and participation in the implementation of the economic policy of the municipal formation.
1.3. The Council in its work is guided by the current legislation of the Russian Federation and this Regulation.
2. The main tasks of the Council
2.1. Preparation of proposals on the following issues:
A) the formation of new approaches to the development of entrepreneurship in the municipality of the Leningradsky District, their reflection in the municipal target program for the development and support of small business;
B) improving the interaction of public associations of entrepreneurs and business entities with local self-government bodies of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District on the basis of transparency;
C) improving the regulatory legal framework of local self-government bodies governing entrepreneurial activity in the municipality of Leningradsky District, including in the financial and credit, tax, property and investment spheres, as well as eliminating administrative barriers to the development of entrepreneurship;
D) expanding opportunities to improve the educational level of entrepreneurs;
E) creating conditions for the economic interest of business entities, attracting entrepreneurs and financial resources to solve social and economic problems that are urgent for the municipality of Leningradsky District.
2.2. Promoting the formation of a positive public opinion about entrepreneurial activity and structures that support the development of entrepreneurship in the territory of the municipality by disseminating the positive experience of business entities and relevant organizations.
2.3. Involvement of business entities in the development and implementation of state policy in the field of entrepreneurship development;
2.4. Promotion and support of initiatives aimed at implementing state policy in the field of entrepreneurship development in the municipality of Leningradsky District;
2.5. Conducting a public examination of draft regulatory legal acts of local self-government bodies of the municipal formation Leningradsky District, regulating the development of entrepreneurship;
2.6. Involvement of citizens, public associations and representatives of the media in the discussion of issues related to the implementation of the right of citizens to entrepreneurial activity, and the development of recommendations on these issues.
3. Council rights
3.1. To carry out the tasks assigned to it, the Council performs the following functions:
1) Makes decisions on issues considered at a meeting of the Council.
2) Develops and submits proposals for improving the regulatory legal acts of the municipality of Leningradsky District on the elimination of administrative barriers that impede the development of entrepreneurship.
3) Engages, in the established manner, to the work of the Council of representatives of the sectoral (functional) bodies of the administration of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District, heads of public organizations, small enterprises, entrepreneurs without a legal entity.
4) Hears at its meetings the relevant officials on issues within the competence of the Council.
5) Requests information on issues within the competence of the Council from government bodies, other organizations and officials.
6) Interact with government authorities on issues within the competence of the Council.
7) Takes part in the development and implementation of the municipal target program "On the development of small businesses in the municipality of Leningradsky district".
8) Submits proposals to normative legal acts in the form of projects on issues requiring a decision by the head of the municipal formation or the Council of the municipal formation.
9) Considers the issues of participation of business entities in district and settlement activities, determines the boundaries of this participation.
10) Submits proposals for providing financial and property support to business entities in priority areas of development.
11) Considers materials on violation of the current legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of the functioning of the consumer market and in terms of protecting consumer rights in the territory of the municipal formation Leningradsky District.
12) Considers applications and proposals of legal entities and individuals on the implementation of entrepreneurial activities in the territory of the municipal formation Leningradsky District.
13) Considers appeals on overcoming administrative barriers in the development of entrepreneurship, facts of unreasonable checks, develops proposals for pre-trial settlement of disputes and disagreements.
14) Provides control over the implementation of decisions made by the Council.
4. Composition of the Council
4.1. The council is formed from representatives of the municipal administration, heads of enterprises and organizations, reputable entrepreneurs.
4.2. The composition of the Council is approved by the head of the municipality.
4.3. The chairman and members of the Council work on the Council on a voluntary basis.
5. Organization of the Council's activities
5.1. The main form of the Council's work is meetings. The meetings are chaired by the Chairman of the Council, and in his absence - by the Deputy Chairman.
5.2. The council works on an ongoing basis. Scheduled meetings of the Council are convened as needed, but at least once a quarter.
Unscheduled meetings of the Council are convened by the Chairman of the Council, and in his absence - by the Deputy Chairman. The grounds for unscheduled meetings are well-reasoned proposals of the members of the Council with a list of issues proposed for discussion and the date of convocation.
5.3. Members of the Council participate in its work personally. A meeting of the Council is considered competent if it is attended by more than half of its members, including the Chairman of the Council or Deputy Chairman.
5.4. The decisions of the Council are taken by a simple majority of votes of the members of the Council present. In some cases, the decisions of the Council can be taken by poll. Decisions and recommendations of the Council on topical issues of entrepreneurship, by decision of the Council, are brought to the attention of the administration of the municipal formation Leningradsky District, the Council of the municipal formation Leningradsky District, the financial management of the Department for Finance, Budget and Control of the Krasnodar Territory in the Leningradsky District, the sectoral (functional) bodies of the municipal administration. education Leningradskiy region and organizations on the affiliation of the adopted decisions.
5.5. The holding of the Council meeting and the decisions taken are reflected in the minutes of the meeting. The minutes are signed by the chairman and the secretary of the Council.
5.6. The responsibility for preparing and holding a meeting of the Council, as well as monitoring the implementation of its decisions, rests with the Secretary of the Council.
5.7. Chairman of the board:
1) manages the work of the Council;
2) holds meetings of the Council;
3) approves the work plans of the Council and reports on their implementation;
4) signs minutes and other documents adopted by the Council;
5) coordinates the activities of the working groups created by the Council.
5.8. Secretary of the Council:
1) prepares documents for consideration at a meeting of the Council;
2) informs the members of the Council on the issues of the activities of the Council;
3) keeps records of all documents, applications and other materials submitted to the Council for consideration.
5.9. Council members:
1) participate in the meetings of the Council;
2) make proposals to the work plan of the Council, as well as on issues related to the competence of the Council;
3) prepare conclusions on draft decisions of the Council;
4) make proposals for convening extraordinary meetings of the Council.
5.10. Control over the activities of the Council is exercised by the head of the municipal formation Leningradsky District
5.11. The termination of the Council's activities is carried out by decision of the head of the municipal formation of the Leningradsky District.
First Deputy Head
municipal formation V.G. Prokopets
A serious discussion broke out around the expediency of holding a council on entrepreneurship in Tatarstan. Opponents note that more officials are present in the hall than businessmen, opponents deny this.
The main discussion about the Council on Entrepreneurship unfolded on the eve of the Telegram channel "Failure". The authors noted that there were more officials than businessmen in the forefront and even marked them with red dots.
Business Ombudsman Assessment Timur Nagumanov differs from the data in the photograph. In his department, more than 280 entrepreneurs were counted, including only about a hundred different officials.
"Red button for business"
The team of the Russian business ombudsman was the first to present its development Boris Titovwho is running for President of Russia. Human rights defender Alexander Khuruji told about the new system "Nabat", which is developed as a mobile application for business. The developers decided to make Tatarstan a testing region. Thanks to the application, any entrepreneur can press the "red" button, Titov's team will have to provide assistance to the business within 24 hours. First of all, this button solves the problem of sudden unscheduled inspections of companies that supervisory authorities are used to sinning.
In 2015, Khuruji himself ended up in jail because of a seemingly economic dispute between his company and the largest grid company in the Southern Federal District, IDGC of the South. The latter lost the case in the Arbitration Court against JSC "Energia" Khuruji and was forced to pay 500 million rubles. But, as is often the case in Russia, instead of settling the dispute peacefully, she decided to transfer the case to the criminal plane. Khuruji was accused of stealing those same 500 million rubles.
Then Titov personally stood up for the businessman. Therefore, for an entrepreneur from Rostov who has gone through fire, water and copper pipes, the issue of inspections and abuse by supervisory authorities is not only a good attempt to systematize work in Russia as a whole, but also a personal story.
The fact that such cases also appear periodically in Tatarstan is no secret to anyone. Now entrepreneurs will have a "red button", how effective it will be, time will tell.
Environmental problems from the mouths of large and not so big players in the MSW market
This time there was a lot of talk about the waste management reform. In the near future, a regoperator is to appear in Tatarstan, as in other regions. There will most likely be two of them in the republic. They will be responsible for garbage collection throughout Tatarstan. Most likely they will be RT-Invest and Mekhuborka.
On the eve of the meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship, the director of "RT-Invest" Sergey Bogatov... According to him, from January 1, 2016, the fees should be paid not by entrepreneurs, as it was before, but by the landfills themselves and regional operators for the negative impact on the environment. Due to the fact that there is still no regoperator in Tatarstan, the payment for the negative impact fell entirely on the waste management companies, in fact, on landfills. The total cost of payment for a year in the republic is about 264 million rubles, which is one third of the total revenue of landfills.
Operators were able to roll over the abolition of fees for the negative impact on the transition period 2016-2017, it was assumed that during this time the MSW market reform would take place, but it stalled. In 2018, companies come with incomprehensible working conditions. Bogatov proposed to support the amnesty for 2018 and to advocate the differentiated rate, which the Ministry of Construction of Russia proposes to introduce.
The head of the state committee of the republic on tariffs answered Bogatov Marat Zaripov... He said that for 2018 the tariff for negative impact on the environment was not introduced, but it will be adopted as soon as the issue of the regoperator is resolved. Then this payment will fall on the shoulders of ordinary citizens. Minnikhanov asked where the head of the Ministry of Construction of Tatarstan, who is responsible for the choice of the regoperator, is. The official replied that the competition will be held in March 2018, and that the reform will be completed by the end of the year.
To change the situation with the payment of companies for 2018, the help of State Duma deputies was needed to raise the problem at the federal level. A parliamentarian was in the hall Fatih Sibagatullinwho promised to settle everything.
Also director of the Povolzhskaya Ecological Company Olga Gudimova complained about the long registration of a waste management license. Operators must obtain a license based on the federal waste classification catalog, but it is constantly changing, which makes the procedure take up to 200 days. It turned out that the problem had been resolved, so no instructions were given for this case.
We also talked about the absurdity in environmental reporting. It turned out that every year entrepreneurs have to submit three reports to Rosprirodnadzor. The entrepreneurs proposed to combine the report and submit it at a time convenient for organizations.
Minnikhanov hinted that no one reads such a heap of papers in the department anyway, so it makes sense "to do some right things for the country."
Entrepreneurs from the housing and communal services sector complained about careless tenants
They asked for protection from the President of Tatarstan and from ... residents of apartment buildings, who filled up management companies with complaints. General Director of Brior + Kausaria LLC Kausaria Matrosova told how citizens seriously spoil the life of management companies.
According to her, instead of appealing to the Criminal Code, residents are accustomed to scribbling their complaints directly to the State Housing Inspection, although many issues can be resolved without involving a government agency. According to Matrosova, it gets to the point of absurdity - citizens demand to replace the light bulb through the State Housing Inspection.
The sphere of housing and communal services is rather closed for residents. Often, residents are simply refused to accept complaints in a boorish manner and are offered to call other phones. Despite the fact that the owner of an apartment building has an agreement only with the Criminal Code, residents are often asked to contact third-party phones. For example, in order to replace the notorious light bulb in the entrance, in Chelny you need to call Zhilenergoservis, with which not a single apartment owner has a contract.
And communal services must fulfill their duties themselves - it should be light in the entrances, regardless of whether there are complaints from tenants or not, and the State Housing Inspectorate allows you to set up any management company in a working way. Perhaps, it is precisely because of the efficiency of work with the state agency that more and more residents of the republic are turning to it, which naturally cannot be liked by public utilities.
Nevertheless, Matrosova suggested a way out of the situation, which could suit the tenants. She believes that complaints can first go to the management company, and not immediately to the supervisory authorities. There is a positive experience in this direction. We would suggest that the State Housing Inspectorate should secure control over the execution of complaints, which, if it is not fulfilled, will come and fine the company.
One-stop shop for children's excursions
Businessmen also talked about the bureaucracy in coordinating tourist trips for children. General Director of the "Tourist Information Center of Kazan" Natalia Abramovich said that after the famous accidents, the procedure for coordinating children's travels became too bureaucratic. According to her, in order to organize a trip, it is necessary to pass the approval of as many as five departments. As a result, the transportation of children on excursions has sharply decreased. In Chelny, children have practically ceased to be taken on excursions, a drop of 95%, in Kazan at 40%.
Abramovich proposed to create a mechanism when it will be possible to coordinate a children's trip according to the principle of one window. According to the businessman, such proposals are already in the government of the republic for approval and await the president's signature. Minnikhanov asked where the document got stuck.
The head of the Tatarstan State Committee for Tourism, Sergei Ivanov, replied that the document "is being cleared up spelling errors." As a result, they promised to accept the document allowing to coordinate children's tourist trips in five days, and not in a month, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow.
The certificate of conformity is valid today, but not tomorrow
entrepreneur
The Federal Accreditation Agency wakes up and decides to revoke the accreditation issued from the laboratory and cancel all issued protocols. The manufacturer does not know about this and is not trained to read the thoughts of the Federal Accreditation Agency. But the inspection authorities are informed about this, which unscheduled appear on the doorstep of the manufacturer and inform him of the disappointing news that he is a violator and must pay a fine and go through the whole procedure again. And, perhaps, soon again to be punished. And so on ad infinitum. There is one scapegoat in this tale. The one who needs the most is the manufacturer.
One of the most pressing problems for manufacturers was raised by an entrepreneur from Naberezhnye Chelny. Everyone knows that in Russia, in order to be able to sell their products, the manufacturer must receive a declaration of compliance with the requirements of the technical regulations of the Customs Union.
The negotiation mechanism is quite complex in itself. A businessman must contact the Federal Accreditation Agency, get a list of accredited laboratories, hand over the products and the necessary documents, pay for laboratory services, receive a test report for his products, the manufacturer himself sends the protocol to the certification body, which finally issues a declaration. It seems everyone is happy, but not for long, notes Akulchev.
The entrepreneur lamented that there is no responsibility of the state body for the revocation of a license from this or that laboratory, so only the entrepreneur suffers from this, who, in fact, did not violate anything.
According to the entrepreneur, Rosakkreditatsiya unilaterally issues and revokes accreditations, and the certification body does not always check test reports. To break the vicious circle, it is necessary to distribute and consolidate responsibility at the legislative level.
president of Tatarstan
I believe that the entrepreneur, probably, should have somehow checked ... But, nevertheless, if the laboratory did not have the relevant documents, then it was not entirely correct to fine. It was necessary to give the opportunity, to warn, to say that the certificate is not valid. In general, this should not happen. If this laboratory has the appropriate documents, it should be held responsible, as well as the body that certified it. I am ready to appeal to the Russian government, to the State Duma
A discussion about the advisability of an entrepreneurship council started on the Telegram channel
Serious discussion unfolded in the Telegram-channel "Neudascha". Unknown authors compared the meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship under the President of Tatarstan with the Japanese kabuki theater.
Telegram channel "Failure"
The seventh extended meeting of the Council on Entrepreneurship under the President of the Republic of Tatarstan has already passed. One and the same thing - a beautiful picture, beautiful costumes, a ritual and carefully verified action. Like Japanese kabuki theater. All roles are regulated - there is Tachiyaku - a wise, dexterous, powerful, attractive main character. The entire scenario is built around this character. There are also negative personalities - various Katakiyaku, bureaucratic officials, with whom they are trying to fight. Some are fought in absentia, and some are present in the hall. Each session, like in a kabuki theater, is divided into acts that can be watched as a separate performance. An important place in it is occupied by the stage, which in a classical theater stands right in the middle of the hall. Each act is ritually unchanged - first the narrator (who is also the moderator) gives the floor to one of the specially trained noble men or the shogun, and he, going on stage, begins his sad narration, which is accompanied in the kabuki theater by mournful music, and in our case, also video sequence: Somewhere again in the housing and communal services ordinary people are oppressed And this injustice obscures my views of Fuji After finishing the story, he leaves and all attention switches to the wise Tachiyaka. As befits a hero, Tachiyaku immediately delves into the problem and immediately makes a verdict. At the same time, the various Katakiyaku guilty of the problem are called on the stage, who, by tradition, mutter something guilty in their defense. But Tatiyaka cannot be fooled - an instruction to the negligent should be urgently corrected. Mournful music sounds again and then the transition to another act follows ... No words - a very original and folklore performance! This is only in Tatarstan and Japan. But, besides the therapeutic and aesthetic effect, there must be something else! First, on the TV picture, only Katatiyaku officials are present near Tatiyaku. But where, in fact, are the commoners-entrepreneurs? Why do they huddle at the back of the stage - even though the show is dedicated to them? Secondly, where are the reports on the results of past performances? After all, they have been going on for two years - a lot of issues must be resolved. Moreover, this council met for the first time this year - the year of the Yellow Earth Dog, so just curiosity tears - and what was done last year of the Red Fire Rooster? But we believe that such meetings are still not a dogma, not an action once and for all frozen in the ritual framework, but a living organism that can change. Unlike the centuries-old kabuki theater.
The criticism voiced on the Telegram channel was answered in the office of the business ombudsman. According to the body, 276 entrepreneurs and 109 officials attended the meeting. The vast majority of the entrepreneurs present are active members of the council's project groups. Those who, over the past three months, have proposed options for solving systemic business problems, have worked out options together with the authorities in the framework of meetings of project groups. The draft decisions, which are voiced by entrepreneurs at the council, are really well prepared. Businessmen, experts and representatives of government bodies have been working for months on the council's platform to present high-quality, detailed, effective solutions.
Nagumanov was accused of voicing prepared questions from previously instructed businessmen at council meetings.
The Office of the Business Ombudsman replies that in order to prepare for the seventh meeting and develop decisions, entrepreneurs held more than 60 such meetings and conferences in the council, at each of which a decision was worked out. Most of the meetings were held in the "Headquarters" - on an open and convenient platform for communication between business and government, to which every entrepreneur has access. All entrepreneurs participating in the council meeting are representatives of small businesses. During the previous council meetings, speakers were: farmers and shopkeepers in villages, owners of small cafes, private kindergartens and medical clinics.